hey's LiveJournal Friends ::entries::friends::calendar::
hey

userinfo
calendar


Where did my product go? 02 Nov 2009|08:38pm

chemistryhelp

| tykkaru_ffxi |
 So I had a pretty bad lab day today. (<1% Yield) I'm super bummed. :(

I suspect that my product disappeared after using the rotary evaporator after collecting the fragments using column chromatography.
I used a eluent of Toluene:Et-Ac 20:1 (Rf value 0.25). Toluene's boiling point is 110 degrees and my product's boiling point was 83-85 degrees. Can I just assume that the bigger portion of my product disappeared in the rotary evaporator alongside toluene? 

Probably should have used pentane as non-polar solvent for the eluent... 
4 comments|post comment


Rate of reaction of NADH 29 Oct 2009|02:20pm

chemistryhelp

| nistha |
Hi guys,

I'm in biochemistry, but a lot of our problems deal with general chemistry concepts.

QUESTION

I have a mix of the following:

NAD+ = .04 ml of 5mM
G3P = .1 ml of .2M
phosphate = .1ml of .2 M
buffer = .46 ml
GAPDH = .2 ml, with a density of 9.7mg/ml

The absorbency is found to be at 340 nm.

Rate of increase of absorbency (delta(A)), is .17/min.

I need to calculate the rate of production of NADH in this reaction, in units of micromoles/min.

ANALYSIS:

The equation is as follows:

G3P + HPO4(2-) + NAD+   -------------->    BPG + NADH + H+

So, there is a 1 mol : 1 mol ratio.

I converted all of the above reactants into moles:

G3P = 2e-5 mol
phosphate = 2e-5 mol
NAD+ = 2e-7 mol

Therefore, the limiting reagent is NAD+.  I would then get 2e-7 mol of NADH, and thus, 2e-4 mmol of NADH.  This is a part where I am stuck.  There is a tip to consider the reaction volume.

There is a law that absorptivity is equivalent to the molar extinction coefficient times the concentration times the length, which is assumed to be 1, so it may be disregarded in this problem:

A = E x C

Since I have moles of NADH, I was considering placing that over the total volume of the mixture (this is where the volumes of buffer and GAPDH become quite useful) and then multiplying it by the molar extinction coefficient of 6,300 (which was given) to get a final absorption, but I feel like I'm just shooting in the dark with this.  

Any direction is helpful.  Again, the rate of absorption is .17/min.

Thank you!

EDIT: Actually, my problem said to "follow the absorbance at 340 nm" which is different from the absorbance being 340 nm.  Absorbance does not have units.


1 comment|post comment

navigation
viewing :: most recent entries

TOP OF PAGE
LiveJournal.com